Imagine it is one of the very first beautiful and warm days of Spring. The air is crisp the sun is shining, a light jacket is slug over your shoulders. What to do with this little gift?
Lets break out our gas powered two stroke unfiltered unregulated air and sound pollution generator! (your lawn mower)
The notion that we are obligated to manicure a perfect lawn and that we shall sacrifice our free time, our health and the peaceful day is madness. Why can't we breathe deep and enjoy what little time we have. Forget about this antiquated show of wealth to impress the feudal surfs, they aren't.
There are over 10,000 species of grass on the planet; 12 are grown most as lawns in the US. This trap is easy to fall into, the store only sells that many. Lawns are an agricultural practice after all; sprawling mono-crops tended and fertilized. The difference is there is hardly a yield. Grass as a crop is very wasteful and ultimately useless. More resources are poured into and on grass than any other crop, some 10,000 gallons of water each summer for a lawn the size of a small motel room. Grass is a $28.9 billion dollar business. With 32 million acres across America covered with turf grass, companies like Jon Deere, Scott's, Husqvarna, Bayer, amoung many others rake in the green and drive the demand for more grass related products. They, or their subsidiaries manufacture massive amounts of herbicide, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and what they call outdoor homeowner power products. Agricultural educational institutions are endorsed by "big grass" and farmers are trained by them. You see there is no interest in the effects of these products and a complete lack of third party oversight to do anything. Do you think the EPA or any government agency has the power or resources to test, regulate, or control the production or sales of all lawn chemicals? Your lawn added together with the millions of other quarter acres plots amounts to nothing less than a chemical disaster. How many of us even understand the first thing about these chemicals? While you consume these products there are people profiting and that is all they intend to do.
Chemicals are cheap and necessary to keep a lawn looking so unnaturally green. Many chemical fertilizers are derived from petroleum! To keep your lawn green you add nitrogen (N), because nitrogen is an element found in the chloroplasts of plants. Your body expels nitrogen as a waste product in urine. Along with nitrogen, urine is a good source of phosphorus (P) which is vital for root growth and flowering. Inorganic fertilizer that contains phosphorous is mined out of the ground. What I am saying is - piss on your lawn; save the planet, or at least a few bucks. Does it seem like I'm joking?
Every self respecting town has a municipal landscaping crew that goes around to parks or roadsides to mow the lawns, if pouring poison on it is inconvenient. Again this is a losing battle, plants will always fill an empty niche. That's our tax dollars at work. A monthly dousing of poison only effects us in the end. I hope that lawn care companies won't be upset with this message. I believe there will still be plenty of work for them to do without grass lawns. I envision a future with grass alternatives, which still need care. The difference is they will require less resources because these alternatives will be adapted to the environments in which they are planted. Really all we need is for people to start changing their preconceptions of grass and the lawn.
Lets break out our gas powered two stroke unfiltered unregulated air and sound pollution generator! (your lawn mower)
The notion that we are obligated to manicure a perfect lawn and that we shall sacrifice our free time, our health and the peaceful day is madness. Why can't we breathe deep and enjoy what little time we have. Forget about this antiquated show of wealth to impress the feudal surfs, they aren't.
There are over 10,000 species of grass on the planet; 12 are grown most as lawns in the US. This trap is easy to fall into, the store only sells that many. Lawns are an agricultural practice after all; sprawling mono-crops tended and fertilized. The difference is there is hardly a yield. Grass as a crop is very wasteful and ultimately useless. More resources are poured into and on grass than any other crop, some 10,000 gallons of water each summer for a lawn the size of a small motel room. Grass is a $28.9 billion dollar business. With 32 million acres across America covered with turf grass, companies like Jon Deere, Scott's, Husqvarna, Bayer, amoung many others rake in the green and drive the demand for more grass related products. They, or their subsidiaries manufacture massive amounts of herbicide, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and what they call outdoor homeowner power products. Agricultural educational institutions are endorsed by "big grass" and farmers are trained by them. You see there is no interest in the effects of these products and a complete lack of third party oversight to do anything. Do you think the EPA or any government agency has the power or resources to test, regulate, or control the production or sales of all lawn chemicals? Your lawn added together with the millions of other quarter acres plots amounts to nothing less than a chemical disaster. How many of us even understand the first thing about these chemicals? While you consume these products there are people profiting and that is all they intend to do.
Chemicals are cheap and necessary to keep a lawn looking so unnaturally green. Many chemical fertilizers are derived from petroleum! To keep your lawn green you add nitrogen (N), because nitrogen is an element found in the chloroplasts of plants. Your body expels nitrogen as a waste product in urine. Along with nitrogen, urine is a good source of phosphorus (P) which is vital for root growth and flowering. Inorganic fertilizer that contains phosphorous is mined out of the ground. What I am saying is - piss on your lawn; save the planet, or at least a few bucks. Does it seem like I'm joking?
Every self respecting town has a municipal landscaping crew that goes around to parks or roadsides to mow the lawns, if pouring poison on it is inconvenient. Again this is a losing battle, plants will always fill an empty niche. That's our tax dollars at work. A monthly dousing of poison only effects us in the end. I hope that lawn care companies won't be upset with this message. I believe there will still be plenty of work for them to do without grass lawns. I envision a future with grass alternatives, which still need care. The difference is they will require less resources because these alternatives will be adapted to the environments in which they are planted. Really all we need is for people to start changing their preconceptions of grass and the lawn.











